
On Sunday I took off in a plane headed for Florida -- where I spent a few days visiting my parents -- and we flew directly over Washington Heights and the George Washington Bridge. Although I was looking forward to the trip and relieved that that plane had made it through the first of its two most serious hurdles (the second being the landing, obv), I felt somewhat pensive (although not in a bad way); I had just finished 'All Souls,' the 1989 novel by Spanish writer
Javier Marias, which is short but dense and -- most of all -- heavy, i.e., imbued from start to finish with a sense of detached melancholy that makes even the simplest acts of life seem somehow tedious or painful.

As I stared out the window at the city below, rendered in delicate miniature, I was struck by one of the -- if not the -- most important themes of
the book, which is the idea that nothing is exactly as it appears. (The book takes place in Oxford -- as in the U.K. -- not Washington Heights, lol?) Under the regal ceremony
and tradition of Oxford -- which Marias repeatedly describes as being a ‘city in
syrup’ -- he depicts a range of (mostly men) who are either drunk, incompetent or
psychotically narcissistic (all of whom are affiliated with the university); in more sympathetic cases, they are spies and
non-heterosexuals (several of whom, it is worth nothing, are dying of AIDS,
although the disease is never explicitly specified as such).

As the narrator’s time passes in Oxford, he becomes
increasingly enmeshed in the double lives of its inhabitants; he has a
(non-homosexual) adulterous affair with a fellow professor, a woman who herself
has painful secrets in her past; he becomes a member of a shadowy literary
society devoted to a mysterious scholar who for unknown reasons (at least until the end) abandoned a
brilliant young career and ended his life as beggar (of which there are many)
on the streets of Oxford.

Marias writes in an obsessively beautiful, poetic and
introspective tone that (to me at least) resonates with European masters such
as Proust, Musil, and Nadas, to name a few; his sentences tend to be complicated (thought not inappropriately so) and he deftly turns from dark humor to sex
to more ruminative digressions and analysis.

If I had one small reservation (I wouldn't even say 'complaint') about the book, it is how at the end Marias ties together several disparate
threads in a way that struck me as a bit ‘Dark and Stormy Night’ (i.e., the
satirical masterpiece by Snoopy: 'Could it be that she was the sister of the boy in Kansas who loved the girl with the tattered shawl who was the daughter of the maid who had escaped from the pirates?'). But this will in no way stop me from reading more of his work;
the book is haunting for its exploration of the horrifying and murky
secrets that so often exist beneath the most reserved and polite (and serene) appearances. The novel is an exploration (I thought as I pictured myself in the city below) of what really exists on the ground, and how life is rarely or never what it seems from afar.
Okay, since you brought it up. I have thought many times reading here that your blog reminds me of "Peanuts." (Of course, I mean this as a supreme complement.) Specifically, your use of the same or similar images to accompany your text often reminds me of Charles Schulz's use of a single image to accompany a four panel narrative. You know: where the same panel is repeated with different dialogue, like the "what do you see in the clouds" sequence. I think it allows your mind to get quiet and absorb what's being said. Thanks!
Posted by: nil blur | 03/25/2010 at 04:24 PM
Thanks, NIL -- I am a HUGE FAN of PEANUTS -- the understated and slightly cynical humor, the skepticism of the collective and so on and so on -- so I take your comment as nothing but complimentary!!!!
Posted by: Matthew Gallaway | 03/25/2010 at 04:34 PM
This post makes me want to get back to reading.
Posted by: fry guy | 04/03/2010 at 10:17 PM