I actually took these shots last week, but this morning is close enough to give you a good approximation of what's going on outside weatherwise. In the past few weeks there's been a lot of discussion about what's true and not true, most obviously in the context of the China/Apple/This American Life report, but also in the context of Mad Men, which is often lauded for its attention of historical accuracy and period detail. I enjoy Mad Men and will definitely watch, but I would be lying if it I said it didn't grate a bit that there seems (at least as far as I can tell) to be little to no discussion of what life in the early sixties was like for gays; in this respect, Mad Men (like virtually every show in the modern era) is a disappointment, because despite having a closet-case character (Sal) in earlier seasons, it in no way captures what was obviously a very vibrant "scene" that existed in all of the big cities at the time. Yes there were laws forbidding homosexual behavior (and even cross dressing), and there were also many more raids and arrests by the vice squads, but at the same time, there was more space in our cities, not only in the geographical sense, but also in the more Orwellian/psychological sense, for those who wanted or needed to exist outside of the margins of convention, or more often, to dip in and out, which is something Mad Men captures very well with regard to many other subjects (drinking, heterosexual philandering, etc.)
I recently finished City of Night by John Rechy, which though technically a "novel" is a firsthand account of a hustler who lives for several years in the gay world of the late 50s/early 60s (the book was published in 1963) and gives you a very clear picture of what things were really like fifty years ago, and it's very interesting to see how things have and have not changed. (Samuel Delany is another writer who has documented this era in his autobiography, The Motion of Light in Water.) There is a common narrative in our society that places gay sex as something that really started to come into its own in the late 60s, became "out of control" in the 70s, and resulted in AIDS in the 80s, which has led to the current swing toward convention (most obviously in the context of gay marriage). My point here is not to argue for or against this swing toward convention (I very much think any two people who want to get married should be able to do so), but at the same time I think it's important to remember that gay sex -- like its straight counterpart -- has always been a constant in history, and when it comes to urban life in 1963, we have the documentation to prove it.